Leaderboard

H Hits

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 195
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 50
3. 3 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 41
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 40
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 30
6. 6 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 28
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 28
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 16
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 13
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 8

HR Home Runs

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 1
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 1
3. 3 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 1
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 0
5. 5 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 0
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 0
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 0
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 0
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 0
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 0

1 more tied with 0

RBI Runs Batted In

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 142
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 46
3. 3 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 29
4. 4 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 28
5. 5 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 21
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 18
7. 7 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 17
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 14
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 7
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 6

R Runs

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 177
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 61
3. 3 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 45
4. 4 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 35
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 24
6. 6 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 24
7. 7 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 20
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 15
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 12
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 8

2B Doubles

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 32
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 13
3. 3 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 9
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 5
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 5
6. 6 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 5
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 3
8. 8 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 3
9. 9 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 1
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 0

1 more tied with 0

3B Triples

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 19
2. 2 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 4
3. 3 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 4
4. 4 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 4
5. 5 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 3
6. 6 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 3
7. 7 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 3
8. 8 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 1
9. 9 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 1
10. 10 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 0

1 more tied with 0

TB Total Bases

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 268
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 72
3. 3 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 52
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 51
5. 5 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 44
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 43
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 39
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 23
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 16
10. 10 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 9

BB Walks

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 110
2. 2 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 31
3. 3 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 26
4. 4 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 15
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 11
6. 6 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 11
7. 7 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 11
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 9
9. 9 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 7
10. 10 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 5

SB Stolen Bases

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 40
2. 2 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 24
3. 3 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 17
4. 4 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 14
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 12
6. 6 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 8
7. 7 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 4
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 3
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 3
10. 10 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 2

AVG Batting Average

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .355
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .342
3. 3 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .331
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .310
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .265
6. 6 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .264
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .255
8. 8 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 .212
9. 9 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 .195
10. 10 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .190

OBP On-Base Percentage

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .466
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .452
3. 3 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .448
4. 4 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .400
5. 5 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .336
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .331
7. 7 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 .312
8. 8 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .305
9. 9 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .284
10. 10 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .281

SLG Slugging Percentage

1. 1 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .493
2. 2 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .487
3. 3 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .419
4. 4 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .415
5. 5 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .395
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .381
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .355
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .274
9. 9 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 .273
10. 10 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .208

OPS On-Base Plus Slugging

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .953
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .945
3. 3 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .843
4. 4 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .819
5. 5 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .751
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .712
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .660
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .558
9. 9 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 .508
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 .507

ISO Isolated Power

1. 1 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .151
2. 2 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .151
3. 3 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .132
4. 4 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .116
5. 5 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .100
6. 6 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .088
7. 7 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .085
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .084
9. 9 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 .061
10. 10 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .039

BABIP Batting Average on Balls In Play

1. 1 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .446
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .438
3. 3 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .427
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .385
5. 5 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .364
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .353
7. 7 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .342
8. 8 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .326
9. 9 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 .304
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 .267

BB% Walk Percentage

1. 1 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 18.7%
2. 2 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 16.1%
3. 3 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 14.4%
4. 4 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 14.3%
5. 5 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 12.2%
6. 6 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 10.6%
7. 7 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 9.5%
8. 8 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 9.2%
9. 9 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 8.7%
10. 10 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 4.2%

K% Strikeout Percentage

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 14.3%
2. 2 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 15.7%
3. 3 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 18.8%
4. 4 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 20.2%
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 22.2%
6. 6 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 22.4%
7. 7 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 22.7%
8. 8 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 23.2%
9. 9 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 27.8%
10. 10 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 30.0%

XBH% Extra-Base Hit Percentage

1. 1 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 9.4%
2. 2 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 8.4%
3. 3 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 7.6%
4. 4 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 7.1%
5. 5 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 7.0%
6. 6 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 5.9%
7. 7 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 4.8%
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 4.2%
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 3.3%
10. 10 CAMPANIA FELIX CASERTA MäsTkalí 🇮🇹 2.8%

SecA Secondary Average

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .333
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .329
3. 3 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .326
4. 4 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .255
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .212
6. 6 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .210
7. 7 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .190
8. 8 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .182
9. 9 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 .171
10. 10 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .145

HR/PA Home Runs per Plate Appearance

1. 1 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 .008
2. 2 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 .006
3. 3 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .001
4. 4 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 .000
5. 5 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 .000
6. 6 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 .000
7. 7 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .000
8. 8 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 .000
9. 9 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 .000
10. 10 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 .000

1 more tied with .000

SBR Stolen Base Runs

1. 1 FRIUL 81 SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 7.8
2. 2 BASEBALL S.C. GROSSETO 1952 S.S.D. A R.L. 🇮🇹 6.6
3. 3 NETTUNO 1945 🇮🇹 4.5
4. 4 BUSSOLENGO 2.0 🇮🇹 4.2
5. 5 PADOVA BSC 🇮🇹 3.0
6. 6 CASTIONESE * 🇮🇹 2.4
7. 7 CALI ROMA GIRLS ROTOSTAMPA 🇮🇹 1.2
8. 8 TECNOVAP DYNOS VERONA SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 0.9
9. 9 TREVISO SOFTBALL 🇮🇹 0.6
10. 10 A.S.D. SESTESE S.C. 🇮🇹 -0.9